Multilayer perceptron model vs charge comparison method for neutron/gamma discrimination in plastic scintillator according to sampling frequency and energy radiation - CEA - Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives
Article Dans Une Revue IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science Année : 2023

Multilayer perceptron model vs charge comparison method for neutron/gamma discrimination in plastic scintillator according to sampling frequency and energy radiation

Résumé

Pulse shape discrimination algorithms have been commonly implemented on embedded systems to discriminate neutron/gamma radiations detected by organic scintillators in several applications. These algorithms have a number of limitations, especially when used with plastic scintillators, which have low intrinsic discriminating ability. Machine learning (ML) models have recently been explored as a way to improve discriminating performance. Most of these methods are proposed for liquid and stilbene scintillators and do not address the integrated implementation. Reducing the sampling frequency of a discrimination system helps to minimize the size and cost of the embedded implementation. The purpose of this study is to explore whether the use of ML tools, compared to the Tail-to-Total integral ratio algorithm, can lead to a reduction in the minimum required sampling frequency in EJ276 plastic scintillator, as well as an enhancement in the classification performance. The results obtained highlight the superior performance of the ML model.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
article_AliHachem.pdf (1.4 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

cea-04276791 , version 1 (09-11-2023)

Identifiants

Citer

Ali Hachem, Yoann Moline, Gwenolé Corre, Jérôme Gauthier, Frédérick Carrel. Multilayer perceptron model vs charge comparison method for neutron/gamma discrimination in plastic scintillator according to sampling frequency and energy radiation. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2023, 70 (9), pp.2212 - 2217. ⟨10.1109/TNS.2023.3295810⟩. ⟨cea-04276791⟩
41 Consultations
43 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More