Comparative test-retest variability of outcome parameters derived from brain [18F]FDG PET studies in non-human primates - CEA - Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives Access content directly
Journal Articles PLoS ONE Year : 2020

Comparative test-retest variability of outcome parameters derived from brain [18F]FDG PET studies in non-human primates

Abstract

Conclusion [ 18 F]FDG test-retest studies in NHP protocols need to be conducted under well-standardized experimental conditions to assess and select the most reliable and reproducible quantification approach. Furthermore, the choice of the quantification parameter has to account for the transversal or follow-up study design. If pons and cerebellum regions are not affected, non-invasive SUVR is the most favorable approach for both designs.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Goutal_PLosOne_2020.pdf (1.17 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Dates and versions

cea-04471372 , version 1 (21-02-2024)

Identifiers

Cite

Sébastien Goutal, Nicolas Tournier, Martine Guillermier, Nadja van Camp, Olivier Barret, et al.. Comparative test-retest variability of outcome parameters derived from brain [18F]FDG PET studies in non-human primates. PLoS ONE, 2020, 15 (10), pp.e0240228. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0240228⟩. ⟨cea-04471372⟩
9 View
8 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More